The Year Jeff Stopped Asking When
It was a Tuesday in early November, cold enough that even Atlanta felt it. Jeff had driven up to the house in Buckhead — not an Uber shift, just a visit — and we were sitting at the kitchen table with coffee going cold between us. He had a notebook open, which he always did back then, pages dense with calculations and timelines and projected dates. He looked up at some point and asked, the way he had asked a dozen times before, when things were going to start working. Not if. When.
I did not answer him that time. I poured more coffee, and I watched him, and eventually he looked back down at the notebook and closed it. Something in the way he closed it was different. Not defeat — I have seen defeat on a man's face and that was not it. It was more like a door shutting quietly on a question that had stopped being useful. I did not say a word about it. I just noticed it, the way you notice a table settle after years of a slight wobble.
That was the year Jeff stopped asking when it would start working. I have thought about that Tuesday more than he probably knows.
Explore trusted resources and connect with professionals in finance, legal, HR, marketing, technology and other key areas of your business.
What I Saw When Jeff Closed the Notebook
The notebook had been his comfort and his trap at the same time. He filled it with honest numbers — hours worked, dollars earned, debts still standing — and then he would project them forward, drawing a line toward some future date when the math would finally tip in his favor. It was a reasonable thing to do. It was also, I came to understand, a way of outsourcing patience to arithmetic. If the numbers promised a date, he did not have to simply trust the process. He could schedule it.
The problem is that the things worth building do not run on a schedule you can write in a notebook. They run on something closer to weather — you can understand the conditions, you can prepare for them, but you cannot negotiate with them. Jeff's timelines kept being wrong, not because his work was wrong, but because he was measuring the wrong interval. He was measuring months. The thing he was building needed years.
"You keep checking the oven," his friend Marcus told him once, when they were talking through a project that had stalled. "Every time you open the door, the heat escapes."
Marcus said it as a joke. Jeff laughed. But I watched it land somewhere behind his eyes, and I think it was still sitting there the morning he closed the notebook in my kitchen.
Why the Question Itself Was the Obstacle
I have spent a long time thinking about what the "when" question actually does to a person. On the surface it looks like ambition — you want results, you want to know they are coming, you want a horizon to row toward. Nothing wrong with any of that. But the question has a shadow side. Every time you ask it, you are implicitly deciding that what you have done so far is not yet enough. You are resetting the clock. You are pulling yourself out of the compounding and standing outside it, watching, which is the one place you cannot be if you want it to work.
I thought about a chip I once left untouched for the better part of a year on one of my own floors — a deliberate act of not-touching, which is harder than it sounds when you own the room. The discipline was not in placing it. The discipline was in not picking it back up every week to see if it had grown. It had not grown. It was a chip. But the thinking that produced that choice had compounded quietly in the background, and when I finally moved, I moved from a different position than I would have a year earlier.
Jeff's timelines were the equivalent of picking up the chip. Each new projection was a small withdrawal of trust from a process that required exactly the opposite. And I could not tell him that directly — the grind teaches certain things that no one else can hand you, and this was one of them. He had to close the notebook himself. If I had closed it for him, it would have opened again the next morning.
What I have learned, over a long time and more than one wrong turn, is that patience is not a feeling. It is a structure you build around yourself so that the feeling does not get to make decisions. You arrange your circumstances — your obligations, your timelines, your relationships — so that urgency cannot reach the thing you are growing. That is not passivity. It is architecture.
What Waiting Actually Cost Me Once — and What I Nearly Did About It
I want to be careful here, because there is a version of this piece where I sound like a man who always waited serenely and was always rewarded. That is not the record.
There was a period — I was in my late thirties, well before Las Vegas, well before most of what I have now — when I was holding a position in a business I had helped build from close to nothing. The thing was not moving. Months passed and the numbers sat flat, and every person in my orbit had a reason why I should cut it loose and redirect the capital. Smart people, people I trusted. One of them sat across from me at a restaurant in midtown Atlanta and laid out a case so clean I could not find a flaw in it.
I nearly moved. I had the conversation drafted in my head — the call I would make, the words I would use. I remember how close I came to moving before the thing was ready, and how the only reason I did not was that I could not find a reason grounded in the business itself. Every reason to leave was about my discomfort with waiting. That is not a reason. That is a feeling wearing a suit.
I stayed. The position eventually moved. But I will not dress that up as wisdom — I was uncomfortable the entire time, and I am not certain I would have held on another six months if it had come to that. The discipline cost me sleep. It cost me at least one relationship with someone who thought I was being stubborn. It cost me the clean feeling of having acted decisively. Those are real costs, and I do not pretend otherwise.
The Principle Jeff Arrived at, Not the One I Gave Him
By the following spring, Jeff had stopped bringing the notebook to our conversations. He brought a different kind of attention instead — more specific, more grounded in what was actually in front of him that week, less preoccupied with the line he had drawn toward a future date. He was still working as hard. The hours had not changed. But something in the quality of the work had shifted, and I think he felt it before he could name it.
We were walking the Strip one evening — he had come out to Vegas for a few days — and he said something I have not forgotten:
"I think I was working to prove it was going to work. Now I'm just working."
That is the whole thing, really. When the work is in service of a proof, it is anxious. When it is simply the work, it compounds. I do not know a cleaner way to say it than Jeff said it that evening, in the middle of a sidewalk with the lights coming on around us.
I have written elsewhere about the afternoon Jeff stopped apologizing for the hustle — the way he moved from embarrassment into ownership of what he was doing. This was a different shift, quieter, less dramatic. But in some ways it was the harder one. Stopping the apology was a decision made in a single afternoon. Stopping the timeline was something that happened over a year, in increments too small to see, until one day the notebook was closed and it stayed closed.
I am not sure patience can be taught. I am not sure it should be — the version you arrive at yourself is the only one that holds under pressure. What I think can be done is to arrange the conditions around a person so that time has room to do its work. That is most of what mentorship has ever meant to me: not the advice, but the arrangement of conditions. The rest belongs to the person in the grind.
I still think about that Tuesday in November sometimes — the cold, the coffee, the notebook closing. I wonder how much of what followed was Jeff's patience, and how much was simply that he had run out of timelines and had nothing left to do but wait and work. I am not sure those are different things.
Note: Victor Draemont is a character, and these notes are written in his voice. Nothing here is financial, investment, tax, or legal advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy, sell, or gamble on anything.